Daily Archives: 07/22/2008

Mauren Dowd NOT

(Community Matters) Snopes.com on Maureen Dowd column of Obama’s internet fundraising here

Hat Tip: The Don Boyd

George the Clown

(Community Matters) Reminds me of the RNC deputy in charge of press laughing out loud as she’d privately cite Reagan’s “safety net.”

I know he’s just being a clown. We all know he’s a clown. So pleased he’s not moving back to Austin.

A Dangerous Job

(Community Matters) The bouncer at a gay bar trying to ban drag queens. in Dallas

I think I’d rather be running Fannie Mae. No tirades please. I don’t agree with this, I’m just sympathizing for the poor working schmuck who’s likely to have spiked heel impressions all over his finely steroid-built body

Op-Ed Buzz

(Community Matters) Blogosphere buzz loud debating NYTimes rejection of a McCain op-ed piece as equal time for Senator Obama’s foreign op-ed piece last week.

The Drudge take here
Huffington Post take here

Contagious Implosion?

(Community Matters) In the Washington Post

Evangelical Christians in Iowa, dominant in the state’s Republican Party, have denied Sen. Charles E. Grassley his request for a place on the state’s delegation to this summer’s Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn.

Political observers in Iowa saw the move against Mr. Grassley as retribution for his having tangled with evangelical pastors in his state. He initiated a Senate Finance Committee investigation of six televangelists for conspicuous personal spending.

“It’s pretty well controlled now by the Christian Alliance,” Mr. Roberts said. “If somebody came to me and wanted to be a delegate to the national party convention, I used to say, ‘Talk to the state party chairman or to Grassley.’ Now it’s very simple. You go to the Christian Alliance, and they determine who is a delegate, and you have to do exactly as they say.”

Freddie & Fannie

(Community Matters) Lots of blogging about each. Two: JT and Megan McArdle.

I get that the two organizations are so reprehensible they shouldn’t survive on the gov’t teat and still provide private returns (I’ve concurred with that for a while now). I’m hearing and perhaps coming to believe that they shouldn’t survive at all. Megan McArdle says may result in US gov’t adding $5 trillion to $9 trillion US debt. I’ve still not heard convinced [sic] arguments that abolishing wouldn’t result in less mortgage market liquidity and thus fewer mortgages, and I’m not speaking to affordable housing – which I’m learning in financial circles usually means subprime rather than the product for those earning 80% MFI or less (the latter may use subprime but not only available options).

while surfing a big on the issue: Spicy: Derivative trading, the global economy and American malaise here