(Community Matters) from Andrew Sullivan
. . . . but it does seem plenty odd, don’t you think, that a leading Mormon would argue that marriage cannot be redefined, when his own church redefined it well over a century ago to outlaw polygamy, previously one of the LDS church’s deepest doctrines? If you can redefine it from that, why would subsequent redefinitions – such as allowing inter-racial marriage – not be permitted?
More to the point: if Huntsman is referring to his religious position, wouldn’t that bar all non-Mormons from marriage as Mormons understand it? No non-Mormon can be married in a temple. Even non-Mormon parents of the groom or bride are not allowed. So if marriage cannot be redefined outside Mormon grounds, does Huntsman believe that anyone apart from Mormons are actually, you know, married?
Huntsman does favor civil unions and says he won’t begrudge a state for passing marriage equality
